Why You Should Subscribe to EuroYankee on Substack
I have been telling truths and getting it right far in advance of most mainstream news and opinion outlets.
I am used to being called all sorts of things, from “Putin Puppet” to “Hamas Apologist” and of course also “Conspiracy Theorist”. The fact of the matter, however, is that the past two years have shown that I got many things right long before the so-called “mainstream” or “legacy” media has.
I have a close group of friends and relatives who rely on news outlets like The New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal to keep them “informed”.
Unfortunately, their reliance on the major media outlets has only gone to prove true the old wag that says, “If you don’t read the newspaper, you’re uninformed. If you do, you’re misinformed.”
That quote, often misattributed to Mark Twain because of its truthful pithiness, is almost universally applicable when it comes to the Western media in the United States, the UK and elsewhere — especially when it comes to topics like Russia, Ukraine, and Israel-Palestine.
Example 1: “Russiagate” and the 2016 election
Basically, I got most aspects of the broad Russiagate hoax right around 4 years before the truth came out in the MSM.
During 2015–2017 I wrote a series of articles exposing several truths including how the RussiaGate story was all just a hoax created by Obama’s CIA chief, John Brennan, to deflect blame and attention away from Hillary and the Democratic Party when they were revealed to have perpetrated the greatest election fraud in US history.
The DNC email hack and a stolen election
First, there was the hacking of the DNC emails and their subsequent publication on WikiLeaks. This was an embarrassing scandal as it exposed the fact that the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee had colluded and schemed to steal the 2016 Democratic Primary election from Bernie Sanders.
In my EuroYankee Blog at the time, I wrote several posts in 2015 and 2016 exposing the corruption in the DNC and the Hillary campaign itself, and showing how they had colluded to “rig” the entire primary election process. All of my assertions were subsequently proven to be correct.
I also debunked the accusation that Russians had hacked the DNC servers, and I exposed the cyber-security firm CrowdStrike, who had provided their services to the DNC, as a highly corrupt and shadowy organisation, founded by a shady anti-Putin Ukrainian oligarch who works for the US “National Security State”. CrowdStrike has recently made headlines as having caused the worldwide outage of computer systems in airports, hospitals and other facilities.
I wrote these articles in 2017, which was when Shawn Henry, CEO of CrowdStrike, gave testimony to the House Intelligence Committee admitting that there was no indication that the DNC servers had been hacked by anyone, let alone the Russians.
However, Adam Schiff, the highly partisan Democrat heading the committee, suppressed this vital, game-changing information, and refused to release the transcripts of Henry’s testimony until May 2020, thereby allowing the DNC and Hillary supporters to go on playing up the Russiagate conspiracy theory.
EuroYankee readers knew the truth 3 years ahead of everyone else.
The 2016 election results
I also called the results of the 2016 election in May 2016, as I was convinced that Hillary was going to lose to Trump — and indeed that she was probably the ONLY candidate who could have lost to Trump at that time.
Don't Drink the Kool-Aid!! - The DNC's Suicide Pact with Hillary Clinton - The EuroYankee Blog
The story of Seth Rich
Others, such as my article about Seth Rich, the DNC staffer who was murdered in Washington DC and whose death has never been solved, will not be verified and vindicated for a long time, since the FBI wants to withhold the data on his laptop for 66 years before releasing it. This despite a judge ordering them to release it immediately.
Rich, who was an ardent Bernie supporter, is thought (by me and others) to have been the “leak” that provided the damning email trove to Wikileaks.
That fact that the FBI is hiding something for 66 years (on par with the JFK assassination files) goes a long way towards indicating that my suspicions are probably correct.
All Kidding Aside, There Are Some Serious Questions About Seth Rich's Murder - The EuroYankee Blog
Example 2: the origins of the Ukraine conflict
On 22 July 2024, The Guardian, a mainstream UK publication, ran an important headline: “Ignoring Russia’s fears about Nato expansion was a mistake”.
The headline was a milestone for mainstream media as the entire Western military, political and media establishment had maintained for years that NATO expansion posed no threat to Russia, and Putin was lying when he said that Ukraine joining NATO was a red line that could not be crossed.
NATO is a purely defensive alliance, they argued, and Putin has no reason to fear it being on his borders. All arguments to the contrary were simply dismissed as “Russian disinformation”.
Fiona Hill, a noted Russophobe and king-time National Security Council staffer, explained the official Western narrative concisely:
“There is no threat to Russia here”, Hill told the Los Angeles Times. “We are not a threat. Ukraine is most definitely not a threat. … But Putin considers the regathering of Russian lands” — including, in his view, Ukraine — “to be part of his legacy.”
Hill, like Victoria Nuland, served under both Republican and Democratic administrations, starting with George W. Bush, continuing with Obama, then Trump. She is a prime example of what the Obama Administration called “the blob” — the “permanent National Security state”.
These “policy experts” are all Neocons who operate under a consistent philosophy, regardless of who sits in the White House. They see Russia as a permanent adversary of the US.
Like Nuland, Hill wants to see Russia defeated destroyed, carved up into digestible chunks for Western corporations and financial institutions to exploit.
Until this week, the Neocon narrative was the ONLY narrative to be found in the mainstream or “legacy” media.
If you were a loyal EuroYankee Substack Subscriber, however, you would have learned two years ago what those MSM readers are only getting a glimpse of now.
In my 2022 article, “Why Putin had to launch his ‘Special Military Operation’”, I explained how NATO’s expanding membership posed an existential threat to Russia’s security, and how Putin had signalled, warned and desperately flagged the fact that inviting Ukraine into NATO would lead to a conflict, with Russia becoming involved.
I explained how Putin wanted to implement the Minsk Accords to find a peaceful solution to the civil war that broke out in Eastern Ukraine between Russian-speaking Ukrainians and Ukrainian neo-Nazi battalions. I explained that the Ukrainians had refused — all the while building up their armed forces.
As the barrage of the false “no threat from NATO” narratives continued, I decided to do a deeper dive on the subject and in 2023 posted, “Can we please stop saying the Ukraine war was “unprovoked”?
This article was also prompted by the revelations made by Angela Merkel, Francois Hollande and Petro Poroshenko that they never had any intention of implementing the Minsk Accords, and the negotiations with Putin were just to “buy time” to prepare Ukraine for war with Russia.
Example 3: CIA operations in Ukraine
On February 25, 2024, The New York Times published a bombshell exposé: “The Spy War: How the C.I.A. Secretly Helps Ukraine Fight Putin”. The article describes a unique “partnership” for intelligence between the US and Ukraine:
“It took root a decade ago, coming together in fits and starts under three very different U.S. presidents…It has transformed Ukraine…into one of Washington’s most important intelligence partners against the Kremlin today.”
I wrote about this “partnership” back in May 2023. My article, “The CIA and the Banderite Nazis” details how the CIA had been running covert ops together with the Nazi-loving Ukrainian nationalist organisations since 1947, and how the operations became more mainstream after the US engineered a coup in Kiev and installed a “pro-US” (and neo-Nazi) government there.
In fact, I have written multiple articles about the CIA activities in Ukraine, such as “The US Wanted a War with Russia, So They Engineered One in Ukraine”, in which I explain the HOW and WHY of the war that permanent Washington wants so badly.
Example 4: The forgotten Ukrainian peace deal of 2022
In June 2024, The New York Times published a “bombshell” story: the “newspaper of record” explained that there had been a viable peace deal for Ukraine on the table in April, 2022, but it was ultimately rejected by Ukraine.
Readers of the EuroYankee on Medium knew about this deal long before the readers of the Times, however. I wrote all about the Istanbul peace negotiations of March-April 2022 in my article, “Zelensky: The Selling of a President”, which I published on July 22, 2023 — “scooping” The New York Times by almost a full year.
In my article, I exposed how Boris Johnson had descended unannounced on Kiev to demand that Zelensky rip uo the peace deal. I wrote how a close associate of Zelensky described Johnson’s meeting with the Ukrainian President as follows:
“Johnson brought two simple messages to Kyiv: Putin is a war criminal, he should be suppressed, not negotiated with. And secondly, if you are ready to sign any agreements on guarantees with him, then we are not”.
And so Zelensky tossed away the chance at resolving the conflict almost as soon as it started.
Moreover, I explained how the Russian withdrawal in the spring of 2022 was not a “battlefield success” as it was portrayed in the West, but rather it had been part of the Istanbul peace deal. I explained how ex-Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennet had intervened to convince Putin to withdraw so the Ukrainians could accept the peace deal “without a gun to their head”.
Example 5: Russia is winning in Ukraine
The mainstream media, as well as the politicians in the collective West, are starting to admit that Ukraine is losing the war against Russia. Over just the space of a few weeks, the Establishment in the West have gone from insisting that Ukraine will win back all its territory including Crimea to instead suggesting that Zelensky will have to cede some territory to Russia.
I first declared decisively that Russia is winning the war in February, 2023, in my article, “How Putin is WINNING in Ukraine”.
In this article, I put the kinetic conflict in Ukraine in a global context, and I show how Russia is using the “hybrid war” that the West is waging against it to gain access and sympathy from the 85% of the world that is NOT part of the US-led sanctions regime:
The longer the sanctions remain in place, the longer Lavrov and his team can travel around the world and tell the nations in the Global South and elsewhere something that might go like this:
“Look what the U.S. did to us. They can do it to you, too. If you don’t do what they tell you to, they will use their unique position to shut you out of the international markets, freeze all your assets in New York and London, embargo your trade; starve you; bankrupt you, make you bend the knee”.
“We at BRICS have a different idea, a way to make us all more safe and less vulnerable to the capricious predations of the US. … Join us”.
My predictions in 2023 are playing out this year, as Russia is preparing to host the 2024 BRICS Summit, in which many new members of the alliance will be announced, as well as the BRICS currency exchange and other financial and economic alternatives to the US-led Western “world order”.
Predicting how the war ends — or not
I have even gone on to predict some scenarios for the end game in Ukraine. On August 1, 2023 I wrote “This is How Ukraine Ends”, in which I offered some possible and probable scenarios around the defeat of Ukraine. In February 2024 I wrote “Washington’s End Game for Ukraine is a New “Charlie Wilson’s War”, in which I posited a scenario in which Ukraine loses on the battlefield, but CIA trained Ukrainian “stay behind” battalions carry on a terrorist insurgency against the Russians.
It appears that once more my predictions are correct. In fact, we are already seeing the beginnings of such an “asymmetric” terror campaign in the Moscow Crocus music hall attack, as well as the recent terror attacks in Dagestan.
Calling out Ukraine’s losses
To me it was obvious early on that Russia waa winning the war. Most honest analysts were noting back in mid-2022 how the Russians were out-shooting the Ukrainians when it came to artillery. While the mainstream media kept running weekly stories about how “Russia is out of ammo”, I wrote the truth: that it was the NATO forces that were running out of 155mm artillery shells, and that Russia was out-gunning Ukraine at the rate of 7–1 to even 10–1.
I am noi military expert, but simple common sense tells you that when you are fighting a war based on attrition and using trench warfare like in WWI, the side with the most artillery shells wins — and suffers far fewer casualties. In fact, I was writing how the actual casualty rate was mirroring the artillery firing rate — i.e. for ever Russian killed, 7 to 10 Ukrainians were dying.
I explained how Ukraine was running out of cemetery space; how Ukraine was losing hundreds and thousands of men each day in the “meat grinders” of Bakhmut and Avdiivka.
Now — finally, Western media outlets are starting to tell the truth:
What’s next?
There are many stories that I have covered that are still being ignored by mainstream media.
Bioweapons labs
One of these is the scandal about US Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine, which I first wrote about in April 2023. It seems that the US did not just outsource its dangerous bioweapons research to places like Wuhan, China. There were dozens of bioweapons research labs in Ukraine, and State Department ghoul Victoria Nuland even admitted to a Senate hearing that these labs existed.
For their part, the Russians discovered huge caches of damning material as they advanced through Eastern Ukraine.
The truth about these biolabs will eventually come to light once the conflict has ended. I am sure that they will be mentioned in any sorrt of final peace negotiationl. Russia has raised the issue and presented evidence at places like the United Nations, but so far the mainstream media has successfully covered it up. Stay tuned on this!
The truth about Bucha
I have written about how the “Bucha Massacre” was a false flag operation, staged by the West at a critical moment in order to derail the peace talks in Istanbul. There is ever more evidence coming to light about this tragedy, but the truth is that Neo-Nazi mercenaries and militia members killed the civilians in Bucha as part of a “cleansing” operation to massacre those who had “collaborated” with the Russians. More on this as more evidence comes to light.
The truth about Nord Stream
The Germans refuse to share their findings. The Swedes simply gave up and closed their investigation. The Danes are likewise mum. No one wants to tell the truth about Nord Stream. I would never claim to be better than the great Sy Hersh, but I did write a story about the truth of the Nord Stream debacle: “OF COURSE the U.S. blew up Nord Stream”. Someday the mainstream media may print the truth, and we shall see.
Some day.
#End
If you liked this post, please consider leaving me a tip! Donations support my independent, ad-free writing.
==========================================================================
I admire your energy and I can't find a single thing I disagree with. That's unusual, and a valuable find for me. It'seasy to get discouraged and go mum when not only the (mainstream) full-court press is against you but also your friends and relatives.
EuroYankee for president! (We need someone who is right on everything for a change.)